DISQUS

Devin · 5 months ago

Actually, I skimmed a few pages to see if there were points I didn't know -- an in-depth report can easily be all fluff or full of interesting info. Indeed, my dead-tree copy had some pretty good reading.

Kristin Maverick · 5 months ago

It's all about what you're looking for. Some people learn from analysis---some learn from the points.

Fabio Vitale · 5 months ago

It is interesting the way you put it. On your business field, business communication, it is a necessity to provide short, straight to the point info. On the other hand, on other areas the argument must be supported by at least some evidence. Tests must have been made and shown in order to convince the audience. Obvious information is easily absorbed, while a new method, idea, or even media must be proved of. Anyways, I am a lawyer and use my computer all day long. I read books in pdf or html, but It is is till not the same as paper. Now, I admit that I totally retired the newspaper.

Tom Hosford · 5 months ago

In depth reports will always be necessary in some form. Statements like "it's where your audience is" are great in that they get to the point, but you need the data available to back it up. Whats a claim worth if it's not supported with evidence?

I do agree that summaries and bolded points should be provided, if you trust the source and are just looking to get the drift.