<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Carrot Creative Blog - Latest Comments in The Social Media Playbook. Useful in a 140 Character World?</title><link>http://carrotblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Improving your site</description><atom:link href="https://carrotblog.disqus.com/the_social_media_playbook_useful_in_a_140_character_world/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:44:00 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Social Media Playbook. Useful in a 140 Character World?</title><link>http://carrotblog.com/the-social-media-playbook-useful-in-a-140-character-world#comment-12927952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In depth reports will always be necessary in some form.  Statements like "it's where your audience is" are great in that they get to the point, but you need the data available to back it up.  Whats a claim worth if it's not supported with evidence?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do agree that summaries and bolded points should be provided, if you trust the source and are just looking to get the drift.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Hosford</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:44:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Playbook. Useful in a 140 Character World?</title><link>http://carrotblog.com/the-social-media-playbook-useful-in-a-140-character-world#comment-12857067</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is interesting the way you put it. On your business field, business communication, it is a necessity to provide short, straight to the point info. On the other hand, on other areas the argument must be supported by at least some 	evidence. Tests must have been made and shown in order to convince the audience. Obvious information is easily absorbed, while a new method, idea, or even media must be proved of. Anyways, I am a lawyer and use my computer all day long. I read books in pdf or html, but It is is till not the same as paper. Now, I admit that I totally retired the newspaper.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio Vitale</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:42:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Playbook. Useful in a 140 Character World?</title><link>http://carrotblog.com/the-social-media-playbook-useful-in-a-140-character-world#comment-12760026</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's all about what you're looking for. Some people learn from analysis---some learn from the points.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kristin Maverick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Social Media Playbook. Useful in a 140 Character World?</title><link>http://carrotblog.com/the-social-media-playbook-useful-in-a-140-character-world#comment-12759308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, I skimmed a few pages to see if there were points I didn't know -- an in-depth report can easily be all fluff or full of interesting info.  Indeed, my dead-tree copy had some pretty good reading.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Devin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:11:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>